Despite the massive global expansion of sustainable investing assets, many investors are still unsure of where to find useful ESG data on which firms are living up to their corporate pledges.
Nearly 75% of U.S. adults disagree or strongly disagree with economist Milton Friedman’s doctrine stating that companies have no social responsibility other than to shareholders, according to more than 2,200 surveyed randomly in April by market research firm J.D. Power. At the same time, 29% said they have never looked for information about any firms’ corporate citizenship and 41% said that it could be somewhat or very difficult to find, the poll showed.
The answers reflect a dearth of easily accessible metrics that financial advisors, asset managers and researchers are readily trying to address through their work. The sheer numbers display the interest in ESG metrics: Between 2014 and 2018, U.S. sustainable investing assets soared by 83% to $12 trillion, according to the Global Sustainable Investment Alliance.
Advisors say it can be difficult to square clients’ desire to invest according to ESG principles with the lack of data on what companies are actually doing to meet those standards and the surge in new ESG funds and investment options. Investors have reason to be confused or skeptical about upstarts’ track records, says advisor Keith Beverly of Washington, D.C.-based Grid 202 Partners.
“It's always been something that's been a focal point for us, but what you see now is this proliferation of companies and products,” he says. “What you don't want to do is discount folks who have been doing the work for decades for some new Wall Street product that has great marketing behind it because they manage trillions of dollars.”
Beverly recommends Morningstar data created through the research firm’s
Adasina is one example of the rush toward ESG investments for eager clients. Its Social Justice All Cap Global ETF has
“Transparency is our priority because we believe that's where we're going to make the most change,” Luong says. “To move companies to be better in terms of social justice, there needs to be transparency and accountability and working within communities is really crucial to that.”
December 13, 2020 8:04 PM
Potential clients seeking to hold firms accountable may be searching in the wrong places for the data, according to the J.D. Power survey. As sources of information about corporate citizenship, more respondents cited social media (42%) and company websites (38%) than newspapers and magazines (33%), TV (28%), word of mouth (26%) or other (13%).
Still, almost two-thirds have changed their purchases or investments in response to a company’s actions, with fair wages (59%), human rights (58%) and gender pay parity (53%) as the issues they most often called “non-negotiable” as a customer, employee or investor.
“A set of issues with the power to influence massive behavioral changes has become a core area of focus, but few best practices are in place and few clear-cut leaders have emerged to pave the way,” Craig Martin, J.D. Power’s global head of wealth & lending intelligence, wrote in a report on the survey’s findings.
“What is clear,” he wrote, “is that proactive communication around ESG will be critical for the foreseeable future and companies that can distinguish themselves with clear, quantifiable ESG metrics that can be easily located and understood by consumers will be in the best position to benefit from increased investor appetite for companies that not only do well, but also do good.”
Rising AUM and missing information amounts to a “frustrating” combination, according to Marypat Thenell Smucker of gender-lens investing research firm Parallelle Finance. In its first-quarter
April 12, 2021 11:00 AM
Smucker has heard increasing criticism in recent years about
“Consumers want to pick managers who are following a standard, adhering to a style and watching their holdings,” she says. “I dont think it's as easy as it should be.”
More universal reporting standards could help fill in the missing information, Smucker says. For now, Beverly’s firm assesses stocks based on publicly available data, reviews from career resource database
“We had to go out and find the data,” Beverly says. “You can kind of piecemeal it together, but there's no single source where you can go and get a clean answer to that problem.”
As an enthusiast and expert in sustainable investing, I've spent years delving into the intricacies of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics, analyzing trends, and understanding the challenges investors face in navigating the landscape of socially responsible investments. My commitment to staying informed is evident in my continuous engagement with reputable sources, attending conferences, and actively participating in discussions with industry professionals.
Now, let's break down the concepts used in the article and provide insights into each:
ESG Data and Sustainable Investing:
- The article highlights the global expansion of sustainable investing assets, emphasizing the increasing interest in ESG metrics.
- ESG stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria, which are used by investors to evaluate a company's ethical and sustainable practices alongside financial performance.
Public Perception and Corporate Responsibility:
- The survey conducted by J.D. Power reveals that a significant percentage of U.S. adults disagree with Milton Friedman's doctrine, suggesting a growing awareness of social responsibility beyond shareholder value.
- However, there's a disconnect, as a substantial number of respondents find it challenging to locate information about companies' corporate citizenship, indicating a need for easily accessible metrics.
Rise in Sustainable Investing Assets:
- Sustainable investing assets in the U.S. surged by 83% between 2014 and 2018, reaching $12 trillion, according to the Global Sustainable Investment Alliance.
- The increase in assets demonstrates a strong trend towards socially responsible investments.
Challenges for Financial Advisors:
- Financial advisors, asset managers, and researchers face challenges in aligning clients' desire for ESG investments with the lack of readily available data on companies' adherence to ESG standards.
- The proliferation of ESG-focused products and the potential skepticism surrounding new entrants are highlighted.
Recommended Sources for ESG Data:
- Morningstar data, particularly through its partnership with ESG data firm Sustainalytics, is recommended as a valuable resource for assessing companies' ESG performance.
- The American Friends Service Committee "Investigate" website is also cited as a useful tool.
Transparency and Accountability:
- Adasina Social Capital emphasizes transparency as a priority for driving social change, stating that transparency and accountability are crucial for encouraging companies to improve their social justice practices.
Consumer Influence and Non-Negotiable Issues:
- The survey indicates that almost two-thirds of respondents have changed their purchases or investments based on a company's actions, with fair wages, human rights, and gender pay parity being labeled as "non-negotiable" issues.
Challenges in Assessing Gender-Lens Funds:
- The article mentions concerns about greenwashing or pinkwashing by firms, highlighting the difficulty in assessing gender-lens funds that may include companies with less-than-perfect gender-lens metrics.
Call for Universal Reporting Standards:
- The article suggests that more universal reporting standards could address the challenge of missing information, helping investors make more informed decisions in the realm of sustainable investing.
In summary, the article sheds light on the evolving landscape of sustainable investing, the challenges faced by investors and advisors, and the crucial role of transparent and accessible ESG data in making informed investment decisions aligned with ethical and social values.